Saturday, July 12, 2014

Get the Win You Want Most In a Difficult Situation

GET THE WIN YOU WANT MOST IN A DIFFICULT SITUATION


Giving corrective feedback or telling someone something they don’t want to hear isn't easy and it’s difficult to see how you can get the win you want if you value the relationship with the person you are delivering difficult news to. But, it’s not as painful as it appears when you learn how to watch out for a few signals that indicate you're making it harder than it is. The good news is the signals come from you. The bad news is, the signals come from you and they’re not always easy for you to see. Just remember the people you interact with can see them.

THESE SIGNALS TELL YOU WHY YOU MAY NOT GET THE WIN YOU WANT

The other day, a friend of mine asked me to help her write up a disciplinary action. There are a few things I know about my friend. For one, she has a powerful aversion for conflict. She wanted help with a few specific sections of the form before she had the difficult discussion with the employee. I was glad to see she was taking the time to prepare and happy to help.

As we worked, I noticed two tendencies which signified my friend was making the process harder on herself than it needed to be:

1.       Each time we made definitive statements about the expectations of the employee going forward, she would verbalize counter-arguments as if she knew what the employee would say in response. For example, as we worked on communicating her expectations for the employee I’d suggest a statement like, “If you would like guidance and support in rebuilding and sustaining professional working relationships with your colleagues who were affected by this incident, please feel free to contact us. Any conversations relating to these efforts will be kept strictly confidential.” As soon as she finished typing the statement she put down her hands, her shoulders sagged, and she said, “She’s not going to believe me, because everybody was talking about this incident.” I sensed she was rationalizing to give herself an excuse to avoid saying what she needed to say because she couldn't craft a message the employee would accept outright. This signal indicated my friend wascompromising her message with logic confounded by her aversion to conflict. There is no way to deliver a difficult message that will be accepted without resistance.

2.       When it was time to communicate the consequence of the employee’s actions in the incident, she would tangent to another topic that appeared to be related, but wasn’t.  For example, I'd ask my friend what she wanted to do and she'd tell me about how she believed the incident negatively affected other employees rather than answer the question directly. I could tell she was evading the question because once she stated the consequence she'd be compelled to follow through and deliver it. Saying things about what you intend to do out loud to other people commits you that way. Her avoidance to clearly state the consequence was a signal that my friend was placing more value on maintaining the status quo in her relationship with the employee than on holding her accountable for her unacceptable behaviors.

WHAT THE SIGNALS MEAN

Regarding my friend's concern that the message wouldn’t be one hundred percent valid in the employee’s eyes, I asked, “Was everybody talking about the incident because you leaked the information you gathered in your discussions with the people involved? Or, was it because several of the employees you interviewed talked about it with their coworkers even though you'd asked them not to?” 

She indicated the correct answer was the latter. I asked her if she recognized she couldn't control what other people said. Sure, the integrity of the investigation was compromised by some other employees and that was an unfortunate fact. However, that fact didn't compromise my friend’s personal integrity or her ability to make logical decisions going forward. She processed my questions and I watched as she moved her hands back to the keyboard as if prepared to continue.

I steered the conversation back to the part of the exercise she'd been avoiding and asked my friend how she wanted to communicate the consequence to the employee. She gave me two half-answers. “Half of me just wants to tell her she will need to fix the relationships she’s damaged and move on. The other half believes this should be a written warning.”

I replied, “In my opinion, the facts you’ve gathered indicate her behaviors warrant a written warning and she needs to take responsibility for mending the relationships if she truly wants to be a valued and productive member of her team. Tell me why you can't give her both of those messages?”

“Hmmmm, I can, but...”

WHAT WIN DO YOU WANT MOST?

My friend forgot what win she wanted most when she became distracted by rationalizations driven by her aversion to conflict. I believe my friend cares very deeply about creating a culture where conflict can be resolved. She wants people to be able to negotiate through disagreements and work with each other productively. She wants people to see her as a person who consistently provides them with the support they need to resolve conflicts. She wants the organization to have great teams comprised of good people who know how to work off each other’s strengths. I believe she wants all of those great things.

So, what was holding my friend back from delivering the difficult message that was critical to getting the employee back on track? What was keeping her from making an effective decision on the consequence? Her aversion to conflict drove her to seek the path that would create no friction between her and the employee. In addition to all of the great things she wanted for the organization, my friend also wanted the employee to like what she had to say and in this case the only way to accomplish that was to avoid delivering the message that was needed most. Her avoidance and rationalization were leading her toward the win she didn't really want because it wasn't really a win, it only looked like one.

I asked her, “What do you want more in this situation, to help her understand that she needs to change how she reacts to other employees in order to continue to work here, or, what you think will make her walk away feeling good about you?”

I watched as my friend thought about the question. She sat up a little more straight, “I want her to hear and understand that she needs to change.”

I nodded, “Always remember that every situation represents a value-proposition for everyone involved. In other words, everyone wants to get the win they think they want. Right now, you need to decide what win you want the most. Yes, it’s nice when people are happy with you, it certainly sounds like a win. But do you believe it’s a win if you need to compromise the principles you believe in to get it? What kind of problems will you create by focusing your efforts on making sure she'll like you when she walks away from the conversation? Is that really the win you want?”
She thought about that for a second. 

“I get all that. But, how can upsetting her make things better?”

“Your task is to deliver a message that will help the organization get better. Focus on the message you need her to hear and you'll end up with a win either way. If she accepts the consequences and makes the changes she needs to, her team gets better. If she doesn’t accept the consequences and your expectations, it means her values don’t align with the culture you want. She may decide to leave or she may eventually get terminated if she doesn’t change her behaviors in which case her team still gets better. So, what message do you want her to hear?”

She didn't answer me with spoken words. The sound the keyboard buttons made as her fingers typed told me which win she wanted most. 

Another thing I know about my friend is she does not lack the courage to do what she believes in. Conviction creates the power to overcome fear.  

I could tell she no longer wanted to pursue the impossible task of trying to make sure the employee liked her at the cost of the principles she believed in. She needed to give the employee the opportunity to decide whether she wanted to make the changes necessary to be a valued member of her team. By choosing the win she really wanted, my friend found the will to disrupt the status quo and compel the employee to change how she interacted with her team in positive ways. As I left my friend to her work, I noticed she was sitting up straight in her chair, exuding the kind of confidence that can only come with conviction.

FIVE SIMPLE STEPS TO GET THE WIN YOU WANT

Having difficult conversations is never easy because they force you to change the status quo for yourself and the other person. Following these simple steps can help you make it as easy as it possibly can be:

1.       Prepare- Do this consistently. The worst results I've reaped in difficult conversations always occurred when I wasn't prepared. Always go to Step #2 anytime you find yourself in a difficult situation and don't respond until you have prepared by following all of these steps. You always want to respond as quickly as possible but it is so important to know your response can lead to the win you want. In other words, don't dilly-dally to avoid, but take the time to prepare so you can act with conviction.

2.       Define the Problem- Conflict occurs when two or more parties seek value propositions which are either at odds with each other in principle (values are not aligned as evidenced by words, actions or behaviors) or in situations where there are not enough resources to satisfy everyone’s desires. Think:
  • What value-proposition is at stake for you?
     
  • For the other party?
3.       Define the value-proposition you seek- Before you enter the fray make sure the battle is worth fighting. Ask yourself, “What result do I really want and willgetting it in the manner I’m planning align with my own values?”
  • If the answer to the second part of the question is, “Yes,” then you know you can proceed to Step #4 with conviction.
  • If the answer to the second part of the question is, “No,” then go back to Step #2; keep thinking about the problem, the value-proposition you want and your plan. If you can't ever get to a “Yes,” then ask yourself if you're seeking something you really don't want. Don't make things worse by continuing to Step #4 until you are willing to get what you want without compromising your values. Otherwise, you'll be on a path to doing something you'll regret.
4.       Define the message you need the other party to hear- Write it down! Here are a few options, you determine which method will work best in your situation:
  • Memory- I recommend this option least. Conflicts are stressful. There is a high probability you will not remember exactly what you want to say if you rely only on your memory. Use this option only as a last resort.
  • Bullet Points- Use this option if you feel confident enough to speak clearly while using an outline to guide you through the points you need to make in a stressful conversation. At the very least, you'll have the cues you need to remember each point you need to make.
  • Prepared Statement- Writing out the statement you need the other party to hear can help you think through not only what you want to say but how you can say it most directly and effectively. When you have the time, this is a great way to craft the exact message you want to deliver.
  • STOP! TAKE A FEW MOMENTS FOR SELF-AWARENESS!- Are you:
    • Avoiding any particular point of the message?
    • Rationalizing based on how you believe the person will respond?

      These are signals that you may not have true conviction in the value-proposition your efforts have been driving toward. Go back to Step #3. Keep thinking.
5.       Deliver the message- You’re prepared. So say what you mean.
  • Be clear and concise- If you wrote out a statement, the best approach might be to just read it to them. This approach may feel awkward but the main point is to deliver the message, isn't it? I've done this more than once and although I have to admit it always feels strange to read my statement to the other party, the approach has saved me from making things worse each time. The point is to stay on message and avoid adding distracting statements. The biggest mistakes I've made in delivering constructive feedback has been when I've tried to add language to try and make the person feel better or to justify some parts of the message. I learned not to assume what parts of my message they will disagree with or question and to focus on delivering it. I wait for them to respond because only then can I know exactly what part(s) they take issue with.
  • Don't be distracted- It’s difficult not to become distracted from the message you really
    want to deliver while preparing. The previous steps are designed to prevent you from trying to rationalize how you will respond to the things the other parties may say. They probably will take issue with at least one of your points though.

Remember, your purpose is to deliver your message.  Don't let them distract you from it. It’s the win you really want. You need them to hear it but you don't need them to agree with it.

If after you’ve made your points you find they still disagree remember, you will have other opportunities in the future to come to an agreement if you keep the avenues for discussion open. This isn't easy because difficult conversations are stressful and your natural tendency is to end the conversation as quickly as possible. However, it’s important not to stifle the conversation because that will only leave the conflict unresolved. Unresolved conflict doesn't go away, it festers.

Learning to be calm and think clearly in uncomfortable situations is critical. Here are a few options you can use to end the conversation. The key is to acknowledge when the conflict is unresolved and that you intend to return to it.:
  1. If they don't agree with your facts- Say, “There are two sides to every story, the truth is somewhere in the middle, and perception is reality. I'm delivering this message based on the information I've gathered. Since you don't agree with it, I suggest we continue this discussion later after we've both had a chance to check our facts.” Then, end the conversation as concisely as possible and go back to Step #1 so you can continue the conversation with conviction.
  2. If they don't agree with your message because they're not getting the value-proposition they sought or expected- You can say, “I understand if you don't agree with the outcome. It’s important for you to think about whether the direction we're taking is acceptable to you. Only you can decide that. What I need is for you to understand the message I'm delivering to you clearly, do you?” 
    If they say, “Yes,” then go back to Option 1, above.
    If they say, “No,” give them an opportunity to ask questions but don't let them distract you from the message, just listen and try to learn what they specifically disagree with or don't understand to so you can address them directly.

    If they try to distract the conversation from your main points then say, “We can address that issue if needed after we've resolved this one. Can we get back on topic?”

    Remain vigilant of your frustration level.

    If things get too stressful and you're concerned you're going to lose your composure or give in just to relieve the tension, go to option 1, above, as a way to keep the conversation going without compromising your position.
  3. If they understand and agree with you- That means the value-propositions you both seek are aligned. This is the win both of you want most! Continue the conversation. Focus on how you can work together to create a magical mutually beneficial relationship.
These five simple steps provide the framework which will allow you to think and act as 
logically as possible in relation to what you value most and the results you really want when you're forced to deal with a difficult situation. 
Oh, by the way, you'll always be forced to deal with difficult situations. 

Finding Success
Get the win you really want and 
PRE-ORDER FINDING SUCCESS NOW!
Follow the steps consistently and you'll notice three things will happen:
1.       You will get incrementally better at communicating with others because you will learn how to become less susceptible to the stress created by difficult conversations.

2.       You will need to respond to incrementally fewer conflicts over time because you’ve resolved problems versus merely creating the illusion that you have.

3.
       Teamwork will improve incrementally. The culture will improve incrementally.

Incremental progress is continuous improvement, each step a change from the status quo.

BOOM!

Tom Eakin
Success Engineer, BoomLife


Want to know if you're on your path to Values-Driven Success?
Try our GPS Theory App at www.goboomlife.com


email us at tom@goboomlife.com

GET WHAT YOU WANT! 
Getting what you want and being the person you want to be can seem complicated and confusing! Together, we'll define what you want, what it takes to get it and help you realize the kind of success you never been able to achieve before! Sign up for personal one-on-one coaching. You can sign up for a program or a single-session. It's up to you!:

Friday, June 20, 2014

Why Meekness Does Not Mean Weakness

Why Meekness Does Not Mean Weakness


At one point in the conversation, Tony pointed out the phrase, “Meekness does not mean weakness,” which was drawn on the glass wall of his office with a dry-erase marker so that anyone who walked by would see it. He said he’d written the statement a few days earlier as a way to generate thoughtful discussion amongst the team and to reinforce the culture they want to create and sustatain at D2.

Tony asked me what I thought the statement meant.

I believe the meanings of the words we use are so important. The words we choose can have a significant effect on how others perceive what we communicate. So, I told Tony I didn't want to answer his question until I’d had a chance to look meekness and weakness up in the dictionary. Before I compared and contrasted them, I wanted to understand what they really mean.

Source: http://s3.amazonaws.com/ligonier-public-media/learn/series_images/DevelopingChristianCharacter_620x348.jpg

Meekness

When I referred to Merriam-Webster.com for the meaning of the word, I observed three different definitions which can be applied to meek people and summarized as: mild, submissive and moderate. These three words appeared to represent a weak-nature at the surface but I knew a deeper analysis was needed.

When I apply the three definitions of meek to the context of Tony’s message, I can see it is most accurately reflected by the first definition, “enduring injury with patience and without resentment: MILD.” I also believe the third definition provides insight into Tony’s point, in that it tells us that meek people do not want violent conflict or negative debate simply for the sake of argument.

Weakness

The dictionary showed me that weakness is “the quality or state of being weak.” So, logically, I was led to find the meaning of the word weak where I learned there are a number definitions which help illustrate the contrast between weakness and meekness. 

Five Definitions of the Word Weak Which Prove Weakness Does Not Equal Meekness


1. The first definition indicates that a weak person lacks strength and the ability to withstand pressure. 
  •  If meek people are also weak, then they would not be capable of “enduring...with patience,” a characteristic which I believe represents significant fortitude. Meek people must be resistant to the burden of stress created when opposed and especially when attacked physically or with verbal disrespect.
2. The second definition tells us that weak people lack the intellectual resources to discern what they stand for and take decisive action.
  • Just because a person is meek, it does not necessarily mean they cannot use reason and logic to determine what they believe in. If meek people were also weak, they would not be able to resist the temptation to give in to contrary opinions or opposing arguments just to avoid conflict. Meek people are not against conflict, they are against losing their calm in situations where their points of view differ from those of others. Taking a stance is a decisive action.
3. When one’s position is “not factually grounded” the ensuing weakness in their case makes it vulnerable to opposing argument (Definition 3).
  • This definition can apply to anyone who does not put forth the necessary effort required to gather facts and understand the situation as clearly as possible before entering into a debate. So, logically, this definition applies to any type of person. What we must remember about the meek is that they stand resistant to opposing arguments because the reasoning they've invested in determining what they believe in creates the conviction to do so.
4. When a person or mechanism is not able to function properly, weakness is present within (Definition 4).
  • This definition applies to the laws of physics and to systems. Meek and weak people are certainly susceptible to faulty design and logic, as are the strong. So, there is a correlation. Just remember, that which correlates does not necessarily translate to cause and effect. Displaying the characteristics of the meek does not preclude anyone from “developing vigor of expression or effect”. So, we cannot necessarily exclude the meek from the strong. 
5. When one does not apply political power or authority over a situation it makes them ineffective; impotent (Definition 6).
  • If we believe that meek people are capable of forming logical arguments to discern their position and are willing to patiently present their case without resentment, then the only thing they give up under those conditions is the influence that is gained through political alliances made with others or the power bestowed through the authority of position. Meek people stand on the merit of their argument. If that means they stand alone and must resist the current of unified but irrational influence from others then they must be steadfast.

Meekness + Conviction = Significant Enduring Strength.



How Can You Be Both Meek and Strong?

  •  When you find yourself in a situation where your point of view differs from others, be patient, listen, so you can understand the real root cause of the conflict.
  • Don’t let the stress caused by the conflicting position you take against the argument of another cause you to try to force the other person to agree with you. Recognize it’s possible that neither of you are entirely right. The key thing to remember is that both of you want the same thing: to be entirely right. The only way for that to happen is for both of you to understand the situation accurately, put your pride aside and accept the logical truth.
  • Be resistant to showing your natural initial reaction to the things the other person says even if they are being disrespectful and insulting. Use your strength and energy to lift their thoughts and behaviors up to a level of reason through your own deliberate and logical approach.
  • When you believe you disagree with what is being said and at the same time not sure how to respond, acknowledge the situation and let the other person know you want to think about what you want them to hear. A rational person will respect that.
  • Don’t rely on your allies to strengthen your argument, depend on the reason and logic behind it. It doesn't matter how many people are on your side if you are not entirely right. All that does is multiply the weaknesses in your reasoning and creates an opportunity to use force to inappropriately coerce someone else.
  • Focus on the logic and reasoning behind your argument, not on how many people stand on the other side of the debate. Being outnumbered is not a reason to change your mind. The only reason to change your mind is if you’ve been presented with an argument that is more logically truthful than your own.

Tom Eakin
Success Engineer, BoomLife

Sign-Up for BoomLife's Newsletter to stay informed of updates, events and news about GPS Theory!

Try our GPS Theory App at www.goboomlife.com


Need an Inspirational Speaker for Your Next Event? 
Tom Eakin's presentation of "What Do You Want?" is designed to challenge the way you define success and inspire you to engineer your own personal, professional or organizational path to success. 
email us at tom@goboomlife.com


Sunday, May 25, 2014

In Memorial Of What's Been Lost

In Memorial Of What's Been Lost

Remembering What's Been Lost
Tomorrow is Memorial Day, 2014. I imagine it was not coincidental that I received an email from YouTube on Friday, the eve of a weekend that comes each year in the month of May and culminates in a day meant to remember the people who gave everything for what they believed in, with a recommendation to watch the TED Talks video, "Sebastian Junger: Why Soldiers Miss War." 

Who do we remember? Whose examples do we treasure most? I'm not just talking about soldiers, even though there is a tendency to focus on them during this holiday. I'm talking about the people who had the conviction to live in a way we each wish we could, regardless of whether they served in the military. I'm asking: Who has served mankind in ways that are meaningful to us? Do we even understand what that means?

Sebastian Junger's message is important and I believe he is right in that we need to understand "why soldiers miss war". For them. For ourselves. Please take the next thirteen minutes and eight seconds and listen to him explain it before you read on:


The last few minutes of Junger's talk is focused on love and brotherhood. Military history is full of examples like those discussed in the video, stories about ordinary people doing heroic things in extraordinary situations because they love the people around them more than they love themselves. As a veteran, I appreciate Junger's message here about soldiers, love and brotherhood and trust forged in the crucible of actions taken for the sake of others. As a human being who is no longer a soldier, I crave that feeling more than anything else. Ask any veteran what they miss most and they'll tell you, "The camaraderie of brotherhood." 

What Do We Value Most

Profile Video - Specialist Ross McGinnis
Ross McGinniss
Source: http://www.army.mil/
medalofhonor/mcginnis/video/index.html
In my first book, "Finding Success," I share a story I read about in Kelly Kennedy's powerful book, "They Fought For Each Other," to illustrate the concepts I've put together in my GPS Theory model to help people define, for themselves, the reasons why they would do things for other people. The story is about a soldier, named Ross McGinness, who sacrificed his own life so his friends, his brothers, would be able to live. When I tell his story in the book and in my workshops, I ask people to answer this question, "What words would you use to describe him and the life he lived?" I invariably hear words like, loyalty, duty, honor, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity, and personal courage. 

I never knew Ross McGinnis but I believe those words all describe the life he lived. The reason why he was willing to personify all of those words, however, can be summed up into one word: LOVE. The people in these workshops often struggle with understanding how to reconcile the tragic results of McGinniss' actions with the example of values-driven success he really provides. The question they're not asking themselves is: Why do we honor him? 

Regardless of the tragic result, regardless of the amount of time he lived after he decided he was going to save his friends, when it comes down to it, he lived a lifetime of love, brotherhood, and trust. Didn't he? Ross McGinnis received the Congressional Medal of Honor posthumously. He couldn't be there for the ceremony. What does that matter? Do we honor him for the medal, or for how he lived his life in the final moments?

Ross McGinnis didn't get to see the results. The medal, the lives he saved, he did what he did on faith. 

Twelve years after I left the U.S. Army, I'm still searching for relationships like the ones I forged with the people I still identify as my brothers and sisters, today. I've known that sense of belonging and a purposeful desire to do what it takes to be worthy of brotherhood and trust. I've looked for it in the corporate and business world over and over only to find myself still craving it like other soldiers who have known it and lost it do. 

I still find myself feeling as Sebastian Junger puts it, "...just back in society, like the rest of us are, not knowing who they can count on, not knowing who loves them, who they can love, not knowing exactly what anyone they know would do for them if it came down to it" (Note: You can find this quote 2:20 into the video). I couldn't have said it better myself. 

Soldiers don't crave war, that's not Junger's message, they crave love and brotherhood with people they trust. My biggest question: Why can't we create those conditions in all of our relationships? Why do we need wars and extraordinary circumstances to create relationships based on brotherhood and trust? I ask these questions because I don't believe we need them. Yet, my experience, my search, indicates without getting ourselves into such dire circumstances, we have a tendency to not focus on what we want the most.

I believe we all crave the same thing as what Junger describes in this video. We become confused about what it means though. We tend to become driven to serve ourselves instead of each other when our situation threatens our status quo. When I rediscovered this simple truth, it inspired the creation of GPS Theory. I developed the model because I never want to forget what is most important to me, again. I am sharing it with whomever truly wants to be the person they want to be because I believe it can help them to always remember what they value most, do things that will make them satisfied with their efforts, and find life-long success. 

How Do We Satisfy The Craving For What's Been Lost?

The moment we accept that we're all equally susceptible to forgetting those three things is when we recognize we need relationships with people based on love, brotherhood, and trust, only then can we be successful in our personal, professional, and organizational lives. We must remind ourselves. The soldiers Sebastian Jungers talks about understand what they are willing to die for- Love, and all of the values that grow from it and lead back to it. They remember a time when they were willing to live for it. They crave the sense of purpose, belonging. They crave the brotherhood. 

In my own searching for success, I've learned the reasons for my deepest cravings really come down to these questions and answers:

Q: Why do I choose to remember and honor people?
A: They have loved heroically.

Q: Why do I need extraordinary situations to love heroically?
A: Any situation where I love is heroic. Loving is the first step.

Q: How can I feel like I have people in my life I can trust?
A: Showing them love is the first step. I cannot plan beyond that.

Q: Why am I so afraid to love first?
A: I am focused on the results. I want success now. I forget that if I can trust the people around me, they will help me get the things I need. I forget that only if I am the person I want to be can I find relationships that are meaningful to me.

The situations we create and the results we want, but have no control over (we can only influence), tend to twist our logic in ways we can't always perceive. We hold tighter to what we have. Our thoughts focus away from how we can gain more strength through relationships based on what we truly value. Our decisions become driven to achieve external results. We lose sight of how the means keep us from being the person we want to be.
  1. We crave love. We can only get it if we give it.
  2. We crave brotherhood. We can experience it when we engage in relationships that are meaningful in ways that represent the person we want to be. 
  3. We crave trust. We can only earn it if we help others find it in us.
When we forget these three things, we try to fill our cravings with things we can get through methods we find easier and emotionally cheaper to invest, like money and things. We then see external results and perceive we're making the kind of progress we want. 

When we remember these things, we recognize the root of our greatest fears. The key to solving any problem is identifying the root cause. We fear giving love, because we may not find the love, brotherhood, and trust in those we give it to. No reward comes without risk. If we don't keep giving love, we'll never find the people who are willing to give it back. Keep giving. You will find the willing, but only if you take the risk! Be Bold!

Remember Who We Have Lost By Remembering That Which We Valued In Them.

We think we honor people who have shown us the way by remembering them. We do. But, it's not enough. It's not really what they would want us to do is it?  What, do you think, they would want more? To be remembered? Or, for us to understand what they believed in, who they loved, and why they lived for both? Any one of them would say, "I found myself in extraordinary circumstances. I did not control that. In those circumstances I lived for love. I made that choice. It wasn't easy, it hurt me and the people I loved. I would do it again. I believe in love that much!"

I want you to think about these questions and answer them for yourself, whether you're reading this on Memorial Day, or any other day:

Q: Who do you choose to remember and honor?
A: 

Q: Do you know why you would love heroically regardless of the situation?
A:

Q: How can you feel like you have people in your life you can trust?
A:

Q: Am I willing to put love first?
A: 

Q: What words do I want people to use to describe me and the life I've lived?
A: 

Q: Am I spending my time and energy on finding the people who would recognize those words in me and give them back?
A: 

Remember what has been lost. Get it back!

Remember the people who have loved heroically. Honor their memory and their example by knowing why you would do the same. The last question I asked you is the question I asked myself on the day the concept of GPS Theory was born. 

Do things that represent the words in your answer to that final question. When you do:

The things you do will help you satisfy your craving for love, brotherhood, and trust.

You will help other people.

You will love heroically. You will be remembered for that by the people who value it. Can you really ask for more than that? 

Never Forget This: You Get It Back By Bringing It Back.

Tom Eakin
Success Engineer, BoomLife






Sign-Up for BoomLife's Newsletter to stay informed of updates, events and news about GPS Theory!

Looking for the Right Self Improvement Opportunities?
Try our GPS Theory App at www.goboomlife.com


Need an Inspirational Speaker for Your Next Event? 
Tom Eakin's presentation of "What Do You Want?" is designed to challenge the way you define success and inspire you to engineer your own personal, professional or organizational path to success. 
email us at tom@goboomlife.com

GET WHAT YOU WANT! 
Getting what you want and being the person you want to be can seem complicated and confusing! Together, we'll define what you want, what it takes to get it and help you realize the kind of success you never been able to achieve before! Sign up for personal one-on-one coaching. You can sign up for a program or a single-session. It's up to you!:




Tuesday, May 13, 2014

BoomShare! Episode #1- Mike Ballman- Oneida Square Project

BoomShare! Episode #1- Mike Ballman- Oneida Square Project

A Little Background on BoomShare!

As I've stated many times, my passion, which is also my mission, is helping people achieve
personal, professional, and organizational life-long success. I believe success is a bit of a "hairball" of a subject because it's definition changes between people and sometimes from day-to-day. 

That's why I came up with this definition:

Success- Getting what you want AND being the person you want to be.

It's also why I created GPS Theory.  But, that's not the point of this post.

I also believe it's important to share stories about people who are doing things that are fulfilling, things that make them satisfied with themselves and their own efforts. These stories can only feed the flames of inspiration for others and help them find the conviction they need. 

I believe there's only way to get what you want, by being the person you want to be! 

So, these questions popped up a while back:
  • What if I could share stories of the amazing people who are doing great things? 
  • What impact would it have on people who want to do great things but don't know where to start or don't believe they can make it happen? 
  • What if the people in those stories were willing to tell others how to get in touch with them?  
These questions have been kicking at me for the past six months. Last week, I decided to do something about it. So, I started BoomShare! a series of video interviews designed to answer all of those "What if...?" questions. 

Boom Share- Episode #1

For Episode #1, I chose Mike Ballman because he's been doing some amazing things for a long time. He fed my inspirational flame a few years ago when we'd reconnected after almost fifteen years. Mike's also a life-long friend of mine and I knew he wouldn't be too upset if I messed up recording the interview a bit...which I did. So, here's the first interview, sans introduction (had to cut it because I made a few mistakes). But, don't worry about the introduction, it's probably the least important reason why we did the interview.  Besides, I'm sure I'll have Mike back as a guest or co-host someday soon and will have a chance to make it up to him. For now, check out the interview we recorded for BoomShare! Episode #1.


What's Next?

My goal is to post a new interview every week. Episode #2 has already been recorded so look for Zak Fick's story about the business idea he's investing a lot of time and effort into: Help University when I post it on the BoomBlog! next week.

I Need Your Help!

I know a lot of amazing people who are doing great things. But, it's not always easy to find a time that will work for both them and for me to conduct the BoomShare! interviews. So, I need to keep the pipeline full. Why is it so hard? These people are busy!

Do you know someone who is doing something incredible because they're allowing their values drive them to be the person they want to be? I'd really appreciate an introduction. My suggestion is to paste the following text into an email and send it to them...feel free to edit as you see fit...make sure you copy me (tom@goboomlife.com) so I can follow-up:

Hi ________ (Insert amazing person's name here),

I recently learned about Tom Eakin's project, BoomShare! Tom is sharing stories about people who are doing amazing things by living by their values every day. The cool part is, he's letting them do that using their own words. He's searching for more incredible people to interview in one of his BoomShare episodes and I thought of you and the work your doing______________________ (fill in the amazing things this person is doing and where, here)!

What's the point? Well, you never know what can come out of sharing your story in a new way with people you don't know. Your story could feed the flames of inspiration for someone else! You might be able to help them in ways they never imagined! They might be able to help you in ways you never imagined! The possibilities it could create are unknown and infinite at the same time!

All you need is to be willing to invest 1-2 hours of your time. Tom does the interviews using Google Hangouts On Air which means as long as you have a webcam and an internet connection, you can tell your story from anywhere!

Tom's going to follow-up on this email to find if you wanted to be a part of BoomShare! I hope you do! My role is to make the introduction. It's up to you two to take it from here!

BOOM!

__________ (Your name here...thanks for doing this...you're amazing too!)

I Can't Wait!

I can't wait to see who you send my way! I can't wait to meet them! I can't wait to hear and share their story!

BOOM!

Tom Eakin
Success Engineer, BoomLife

Sign-Up for BoomLife's Newsletter to stay informed of updates, events and news about GPS Theory!

Looking for the Right Self Improvement Opportunities?
Try our GPS Theory App at www.goboomlife.com


Need an Inspirational Speaker for Your Next Event? 
Tom Eakin's presentation of "What Do You Want?" is designed to challenge the way you define success and inspire you to engineer your own personal, professional or organizational path to success. 
email us at tom@goboomlife.com

GET WHAT YOU WANT! 
Getting what you want and being the person you want to be can seem complicated and confusing! Together, we'll define what you want, what it takes to get it and help you realize the kind of success you never been able to achieve before! Sign up for personal one-on-one coaching. You can sign up for a program or a single-session. It's up to you!: